0038. Count and Say¶
Table of Contents¶
- Problem
- Problem Breakdown
- Approach 1: Iterative
- Approach 2: Recursive
- Complexity Comparison
- Edge Cases
- Common Mistakes
- Related Problems
- Visual Animation
Problem¶
| Leetcode | 38. Count and Say |
| Difficulty | |
| Tags | String |
Description¶
The count-and-say sequence is a sequence of digit strings defined by the recursive formula:
countAndSay(1) = "1"countAndSay(n)is the run-length encoding ofcountAndSay(n - 1).Run-length encoding (RLE) is a string compression method that works by replacing consecutive identical characters (repeated 2 or more times) with the concatenation of the character and the number marking the count of the characters (length of the run). For example, to compress the string
"3322251"we replace"33"with"23", replace"222"with"32", replace"5"with"15"and replace"1"with"11". Thus the compressed string becomes"23321511".Given a positive integer
n, return thenth element of the count-and-say sequence.
Examples¶
Example 1:
Input: n = 4
Output: "1211"
Explanation:
countAndSay(1) = "1"
countAndSay(2) = RLE of "1" = "11" (one 1)
countAndSay(3) = RLE of "11" = "21" (two 1s)
countAndSay(4) = RLE of "21" = "1211" (one 2, one 1)
Example 2:
Input: n = 1
Output: "1"
Explanation: This is the base case.
Constraints¶
1 <= n <= 30
Problem Breakdown¶
1. What is being asked?¶
Generate the nth term of the count-and-say sequence. Each term is produced by "reading aloud" the digits of the previous term — counting consecutive runs of the same digit.
2. What is the input?¶
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
n | int | The index (1-based) of the desired term in the sequence |
Important observations about the input: - n is always at least 1 - The base case is n = 1 which returns "1" - Each term is built from the previous term
3. What is the output?¶
- A string — the nth term of the count-and-say sequence
- The string only contains digits
1,2, and3(proven by the sequence properties)
4. Constraints analysis¶
| Constraint | Significance |
|---|---|
n <= 30 | The 30th term has ~5,808 characters. No performance concerns. |
n >= 1 | Always valid input, base case is trivial. |
5. Step-by-step example analysis¶
Building the sequence from n=1 to n=7¶
n=1: "1"
Read: one 1
n=2: "11"
Read: two 1s
n=3: "21"
Read: one 2, one 1
n=4: "1211"
Read: one 1, one 2, two 1s
n=5: "111221"
Read: three 1s, two 2s, one 1
n=6: "312211"
Read: one 3, one 1, two 2s, two 1s
n=7: "13112221"
Detailed RLE process for n=5 -> n=6¶
Input: "111221"
Scan left to right:
"111" → three 1s → "31"
"22" → two 2s → "22"
"1" → one 1 → "11"
Concatenate: "31" + "22" + "11" = "312211"
Result: countAndSay(6) = "312211"
6. Key Observations¶
- Sequential dependency — Each term depends on the previous term. We must build the sequence step by step.
- Run-length encoding — The core operation is counting consecutive identical characters.
- String grows — The length of each term generally grows, but n <= 30 keeps it manageable.
- Only digits 1, 2, 3 — The sequence never produces digits larger than 3 (mathematical property).
7. Pattern identification¶
| Pattern | Why it fits | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Iterative simulation | Build each term from the previous one | Count and Say (this problem) |
| Recursion | Natural recursive definition | Base case n=1, recurse on n-1 |
Chosen pattern: String simulation with RLE Reason: Directly simulate the process described in the problem. Either iterate from 1 to n, or recurse from n down to 1.
Approach 1: Iterative¶
Thought process¶
Start with
"1"and build each subsequent term by performing run-length encoding on the current term. Repeatn-1times to get the nth term.For RLE: scan the string left to right, count consecutive identical characters, and append "count" + "digit" to the result.
Algorithm (step-by-step)¶
- Initialize
result = "1" - Repeat
n-1times: a. Initialize an empty stringnextb. Seti = 0c. Whilei < len(result):- Set
digit = result[i],count = 1 - While
i + count < len(result)andresult[i + count] == digit: incrementcount - Append
str(count) + digittonext - Move
i += countd. Setresult = next
- Set
- Return
result
Pseudocode¶
function countAndSay(n):
result = "1"
for step = 2 to n:
next = ""
i = 0
while i < len(result):
digit = result[i]
count = 1
while i + count < len(result) AND result[i + count] == digit:
count++
next += str(count) + digit
i += count
result = next
return result
Complexity¶
| Complexity | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n * L) | n iterations, each processing a string of length L (max ~5808 for n=30) |
| Space | O(L) | Store the current and next strings |
Implementation¶
Go¶
// countAndSay — Iterative approach
// Time: O(n * L), Space: O(L)
func countAndSay(n int) string {
result := "1"
for step := 2; step <= n; step++ {
var next strings.Builder
i := 0
for i < len(result) {
digit := result[i]
count := 1
// Count consecutive identical digits
for i+count < len(result) && result[i+count] == digit {
count++
}
// Append count and digit
next.WriteString(strconv.Itoa(count))
next.WriteByte(digit)
i += count
}
result = next.String()
}
return result
}
Java¶
class Solution {
// countAndSay — Iterative approach
// Time: O(n * L), Space: O(L)
public String countAndSay(int n) {
String result = "1";
for (int step = 2; step <= n; step++) {
StringBuilder next = new StringBuilder();
int i = 0;
while (i < result.length()) {
char digit = result.charAt(i);
int count = 1;
// Count consecutive identical digits
while (i + count < result.length() && result.charAt(i + count) == digit) {
count++;
}
// Append count and digit
next.append(count);
next.append(digit);
i += count;
}
result = next.toString();
}
return result;
}
}
Python¶
class Solution:
def countAndSay(self, n: int) -> str:
"""
Iterative approach
Time: O(n * L), Space: O(L)
"""
result = "1"
for step in range(2, n + 1):
next_result = []
i = 0
while i < len(result):
digit = result[i]
count = 1
# Count consecutive identical digits
while i + count < len(result) and result[i + count] == digit:
count += 1
# Append count and digit
next_result.append(str(count))
next_result.append(digit)
i += count
result = "".join(next_result)
return result
Dry Run¶
Input: n = 5
Step 1: result = "1" (base case)
Step 2: Process "1"
i=0: digit='1', count=1 → "11"
result = "11"
Step 3: Process "11"
i=0: digit='1', count=2 → "21"
result = "21"
Step 4: Process "21"
i=0: digit='2', count=1 → "12"
i=1: digit='1', count=1 → "11"
result = "1211"
Step 5: Process "1211"
i=0: digit='1', count=1 → "11"
i=1: digit='2', count=1 → "12"
i=2: digit='1', count=2 → "21"
result = "111221"
Result: "111221"
Approach 2: Recursive¶
Thought process¶
The problem has a natural recursive definition: - Base case:
countAndSay(1) = "1"- Recursive case:countAndSay(n) = RLE(countAndSay(n-1))We can directly translate this definition into code. First recursively compute the (n-1)th term, then perform RLE on it.
Algorithm (step-by-step)¶
- Base case: if
n == 1, return"1" - Recursively compute
prev = countAndSay(n - 1) - Perform run-length encoding on
prev: a. Scan left to right, count consecutive identical digits b. Appendstr(count) + digitfor each run - Return the RLE result
Pseudocode¶
function countAndSay(n):
if n == 1:
return "1"
prev = countAndSay(n - 1)
result = ""
i = 0
while i < len(prev):
digit = prev[i]
count = 1
while i + count < len(prev) AND prev[i + count] == digit:
count++
result += str(count) + digit
i += count
return result
Complexity¶
| Complexity | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n * L) | n recursive calls, each processing a string of length L |
| Space | O(n * L) | Recursion stack depth n, plus strings at each level |
Implementation¶
Go¶
// countAndSay — Recursive approach
// Time: O(n * L), Space: O(n * L)
func countAndSay(n int) string {
// Base case
if n == 1 {
return "1"
}
// Recursively get the previous term
prev := countAndSay(n - 1)
// Perform RLE on the previous term
var result strings.Builder
i := 0
for i < len(prev) {
digit := prev[i]
count := 1
// Count consecutive identical digits
for i+count < len(prev) && prev[i+count] == digit {
count++
}
// Append count and digit
result.WriteString(strconv.Itoa(count))
result.WriteByte(digit)
i += count
}
return result.String()
}
Java¶
class Solution {
// countAndSay — Recursive approach
// Time: O(n * L), Space: O(n * L)
public String countAndSay(int n) {
// Base case
if (n == 1) {
return "1";
}
// Recursively get the previous term
String prev = countAndSay(n - 1);
// Perform RLE on the previous term
StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
int i = 0;
while (i < prev.length()) {
char digit = prev.charAt(i);
int count = 1;
// Count consecutive identical digits
while (i + count < prev.length() && prev.charAt(i + count) == digit) {
count++;
}
// Append count and digit
result.append(count);
result.append(digit);
i += count;
}
return result.toString();
}
}
Python¶
class Solution:
def countAndSay(self, n: int) -> str:
"""
Recursive approach
Time: O(n * L), Space: O(n * L)
"""
# Base case
if n == 1:
return "1"
# Recursively get the previous term
prev = self.countAndSay(n - 1)
# Perform RLE on the previous term
result = []
i = 0
while i < len(prev):
digit = prev[i]
count = 1
# Count consecutive identical digits
while i + count < len(prev) and prev[i + count] == digit:
count += 1
# Append count and digit
result.append(str(count))
result.append(digit)
i += count
return "".join(result)
Dry Run¶
Input: n = 4
countAndSay(4)
→ calls countAndSay(3)
→ calls countAndSay(2)
→ calls countAndSay(1)
← returns "1"
RLE("1"):
i=0: digit='1', count=1 → "11"
← returns "11"
RLE("11"):
i=0: digit='1', count=2 → "21"
← returns "21"
RLE("21"):
i=0: digit='2', count=1 → "12"
i=1: digit='1', count=1 → "11"
← returns "1211"
Call stack unwinding:
countAndSay(1) = "1"
countAndSay(2) = RLE("1") = "11"
countAndSay(3) = RLE("11") = "21"
countAndSay(4) = RLE("21") = "1211"
Result: "1211"
Complexity Comparison¶
| # | Approach | Time | Space | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iterative | O(n * L) | O(L) | Lower space usage, no stack overhead | Slightly more code |
| 2 | Recursive | O(n * L) | O(n * L) | Clean, mirrors problem definition | Extra stack space, risk of stack overflow for large n |
Which solution to choose?¶
- In an interview: Approach 1 (Iterative) — straightforward, efficient, easy to explain
- In production: Approach 1 — better space complexity, no recursion overhead
- On Leetcode: Both pass easily since n <= 30
- For learning: Approach 2 — helps understand the recursive nature of the problem
Edge Cases¶
| # | Case | Input | Expected Output | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Base case | n=1 | "1" | First term is defined as "1" |
| 2 | Second term | n=2 | "11" | One 1 |
| 3 | Third term | n=3 | "21" | Two 1s |
| 4 | Multiple runs | n=5 | "111221" | Three 1s, two 2s, one 1 |
| 5 | Maximum input | n=30 | 5808-char string | Must handle long strings |
Common Mistakes¶
Mistake 1: Confusing the "count" and "digit" order¶
# WRONG — digit before count
result += digit + str(count) # "12" instead of "21" for two 1s
# CORRECT — count before digit
result += str(count) + digit # "21" for two 1s
Reason: Run-length encoding is "how many" followed by "what digit". "21" means "two 1s", not "twelve".
Mistake 2: Not handling consecutive runs correctly¶
# WRONG — only comparing adjacent pairs
for i in range(len(s)):
if i + 1 < len(s) and s[i] == s[i + 1]:
count += 1
else:
result += str(count) + s[i]
count = 1
# CORRECT — use a while loop to consume entire run
i = 0
while i < len(s):
digit = s[i]
count = 1
while i + count < len(s) and s[i + count] == digit:
count += 1
result += str(count) + digit
i += count
Reason: The first approach can miscount runs of length 3+ if the logic for resetting count is not carefully handled.
Mistake 3: Off-by-one in iteration count¶
# WRONG — iterating n times instead of n-1
result = "1"
for i in range(n): # This produces the (n+1)th term!
result = rle(result)
# CORRECT — iterate n-1 times (we start with the 1st term)
result = "1"
for i in range(n - 1):
result = rle(result)
Reason: We start with "1" as the 1st term, so we only need n-1 transformations.
Related Problems¶
| # | Problem | Difficulty | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 443. String Compression | Run-length encoding | |
| 2 | 271. Encode and Decode Strings | String encoding | |
| 3 | 394. Decode String | String decoding with counts | |
| 4 | 1313. Decompress Run-Length Encoded List | RLE decompression |
Visual Animation¶
Interactive animation: animation.html
In the animation: - Step-by-step sequence building from n=1 to chosen n - Run-length encoding visualization with character grouping - Preset buttons for n=1 through n=7 - Play/Pause/Step/Reset controls with speed slider - Detailed log of each step's RLE process